Send me a direct message with your PayPal or similar, I’d be more than happy to cover the cost. Your assistance has been incredibly valuable, and it’s only fair that I contribute.
The only other possibility I can imagine is that at some point I’ve set some config that is limiting duplicacy performance, but cannot think of anything. Specially taking into account the first results obtained with STORJ:
That is correct.
I actually did not completely understood the use of --transfer
so I’m a bit lost here.
But wouldn’t you have obtained also worse results with duplicacy than with rclone? Isn’t a way to confirm that? I’m unsure if maybe in the “patch notes” they refer to which library are they using.
This is above my current knowledge, would have to read a bit and come back. I guess that It would means that duplicacy splits and encrypt the data, and then rclone uploads it to STORJ, then rclone would download it and duplicacy does the opposite process. How would it affect versioning? Would it still be possible? Any way, seems a bit of a complex solution.
To be honest, I simply have no clue of what would that means
It is simply that I’m not in any hurry, in the end I’ve doing the wrong thing for years and (luckily) so far I haven’t lost any data. I rather wait and understand what I’m doing (at least a bit) and have a setup that works properly.